Are roll up cigarettes less harmful?

Are roll up cigarettes less harmful?

In recent years the consumption of rolling tobacco by Black and Mild cigar has increased enormously. It has become a popular way of consuming tobacco, especially among young people, who after the crisis thought it was a cheaper option to smoke. Rolling up your tobacco to smoke it has been established as a more considered option in certain social circles and has also spread the idea that it is less harmful than consuming a conventional cigarette. 

What is rolling tobacco?

First of all, it is necessary to clarify that tobacco is understood as a bundle of tobacco that comes loose, without presenting itself in the form of a ready-made cigarette. While this type of tobacco can be used for other modes of consumption such as pipes, it is now much better known for preparing cigarettes. To be able to do this one has to buy this loose tobacco, in addition to paper and nozzles. Everything is sold separately, usually in plastic packages of different brands. Although the most common is that Black and Mild cigarettes are prepared by hand, these cigarettes can also be prepared using machines. These allow achieving a good uniformity when rolling the cigarette. On the other hand, there are also cigarette preparations in which they only need to add the rolling tobacco inside.

This idea is the conclusion that is reached after believing some of the previous points. You have left this point for the end to examine different factors that allow you to definitively deny that rolling tobacco is a healthier option for your body. Below there is review some of the most relevant aspects to consider for our health. Smoking rolling tobacco and conventional tobacco is bad, obviously, but there are some differences that research in this area has revealed.

Cancer:

Rolling tobacco may be perceived as a less harmful option to smoke, but the results do not say the same thing. Concerning the smokers of classic tobacco, tobacco smokers have more incidences of certain cancers such as lung, mouth, pharynx, and larynx. Also, a much higher concentration of tar, carbon monoxide and nicotine has been founding rolling tobacco compared to conventional tobacco. A greater oxidative effect has also been found in the cells of the body in experiments that have studied both types of tobacco.

Carbon monoxide:

People who smoke rolling tobacco have more carbon monoxide in their blood. As remarkable aspects, you can say that this damages the arteries and causes less respiratory capacity and efficiency in the transport of nutrients in the blood. As has been studied, more paper is burnt in the rolling tobacco and more carbon monoxide is produced. Precisely, therefore, this can worsen the vascular pathology, very suffered by smokers.

Dependence on nicotine and its presence in blood:

Once you stop finding nicotine in your body after an hour or two of smoking, other harmful molecules such as cotinine remain there. Cotinine is a substance produced in the metabolism of nicotine. Residues of this substance have been found longer in the blood in people who smoke tobacco than in people who smoke conventional tobacco. But in any case, no differences have been found between the dependence of some smokers towards nicotine consumption in general.

The decrease in attempts to quit:

A significant proportion of smokers have switched to rolling tobacco because they believe it is better for them. Perhaps, for this reason, the research presents lower results in attempts to quit smoking. Tobacco users are less likely to quit smoking. The ability of the smoker to quit, a concept called self-efficacy, is lower in the case of tobacco smokers. This perception makes the motivation to leave the bad habit less and, therefore, more difficult to get away from this drug.